Last week, a friend and I were discussing the concept of modesty. Who really has the authority to determine whether something is modest or not? Is it the person who wears the clothing? Or is it the viewer of the person who is wearing the clothing in question? Or perhaps both? As we talked about this idea, I suggested that the person who wears clothing should have the authority to determine whether his or her clothing is modest. If someone is wearing something with the intent of being sexy or suggestive, then such clothing should not be considered modest.I began thinking about this conversation today, when I noticed someone post this image of Emma Watson on Facebook (see above), which includes an excerpt from this quote by Watson: "What's sexy about saying, 'I'm here with my boobs and a short skirt, have a look at everything I've got?' My idea of sexy is that less is more. The less you reveal the more people can wonder."
I've seen this image and quote before - it seems to get circulated intermittently in LDS circles. I have to admit, I think that such circulation is a little ironic. Yes, it makes sense that LDS people would want to promote Watson's idea of modesty covering up your body. But if you read the quote, Watson is still promoting sexiness and self-objectification. I don't think this constitutes modesty from an LDS perspective. In theory, Mormons promote modesty as a way to avoid provoking sexual (lustful) thoughts in others. (But perhaps the popularity of this image and quote among Mormons suggests that they actually want to be sexy, too?)
So, yes, Emma Watson does want to cover up her body. But she still wants others to think about her body. (It is actually this self-objectification that bothers me more than anything, mostly from a feminist standpoint. Argh!)
Thoughts, anyone?














